The DOD authorized scientists to spread, “what was thought harmless”, bacteria (Bacillus Globigii ) across US cities and on public transport.
They were trying to simulate a major bioweapons attack on the US.
During one test in 1966, they dropped light bulbs carrying powdered Bacillus Globigii on the New York City subway. They then stalked citizens to measure how the bacteria spread, using a motorized vacuum devise concealed inside a suitcase.
Later research showed that the strain of Bacillus Globigii did pose a risk to people who were already sick or had weak immune systems.
BG infections result mainly from penetrating exposed injuries, surgical procedures, catheters, and intravenous lines. Debilitated health can occur, fever is a primary symptom in these infections
If it infects a food source then victims could suffer food poisoning resulting in diarrhea and vomiting.
Other symptoms that may occur are sweating, abdominal pain and nausea.
Recovery time ranges from 13 days to 6 weeks.
Reality Decoded 
Nice to see our tax payer dollars at work making things worse for the taxpayer. Dang it, what is wrong with these … people. Hugs
LikeLiked by 4 people
I’ve learned that despite the titles men give themselves some are cold and don’t care.
Those people are mixed in everywhere on earth, in every group, every party, every religion, every movement, they are simply everywhere. They stay hidden but they are usually the ones who are the most agreeable where they are.
They always go with whatever everyone else wants, no matter how monstrous it is.
Strange
LikeLiked by 4 people
Hehehehe, ever heard of 5G?
LikeLiked by 1 person
The new band being rolled out nationwide. 5G everywhere is the current goal.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Like the X-Ray foot wear and autonomous cars, glowing watches and whatever else. I guess we will have to wait for the actual price.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There is a dark back story with 5G. I will most likely put out an article in the future, but I think you may be interested to know that there are people who have to move after it’s put in.
They can’t sleep well, and they get headaches. (not everyone) just a small percentage of people.
There’s more but I think you will start googling if you are interested.
It is literally another case of more tech less people.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Ive heard that 5G is required every 500 feet.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The big question is how will your body respond to it?
LikeLiked by 2 people
an answer that doesn’t need to be answered
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fair enough
LikeLiked by 1 person
GWB wasn’t joking when he said, “Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we.”
The U.S. military and covert government agencies have been conducting experiments on unsuspecting citizens for a long time.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I wonder sometimes… What if it isn’t what we think it is.
What if it’s only a small percentage of people who take pleasure in such things and they are spread out…. Like an infection, a subset of the human race that likes to cause harm while the rest do not, but don’t stop them.
Just a thought
LikeLiked by 1 person
I can’t speculate on the number of people who take pleasure in such things, but aren’t we equally culpable for supporting political systems that grant men the power to engage their wicked fantasies?
LikeLiked by 1 person
You asked — “aren’t we equally culpable for supporting political systems that grant men the power to engage their wicked fantasies?”
My response — Only if the same rule can be applied everywhere else.
If a person harms others should the parent should be blamed? Then the state he came from? Then the entire country he works for?
We would run out of people, everyone would be in jail.
Simply put everyone is to blame but only the person who did the deed should be punished.
LikeLike
I don’t think that parents can be held accountable for the actions of their offspring unless they willfully goaded them into committing those actions. But I think those who consciously elect warmongers to power should be implicated for war crimes, as well.
LikeLike
You stated— “But I think those who consciously elect warmongers to power should be implicated”
My response— I see… How does one know who is and isn’t a warmonger before they are elected?
LikeLike
Assuming they haven’t already expressed their position in their campaign platform, you ask them directly.
LikeLike
You stated— “Assuming they haven’t already expressed their position in their campaign platform, you ask them directly.”
My response— So your solution is to start with assumptions and end with the honor system to detect warmongering individuals.
Do you see any challenges there? With a system like that you might elect a saint and give him a peace prize only to realize later he loves war.
Just a thought
LikeLike
My proposal is a bit more nuanced than that. For one thing, political candidates should be required to pass core competency tests prior to being allowed to run for office. If all other professional trades require a license to operate, why should politicians be exempted from meeting similar standards? Second, citizens should also be required to demonstrate they meet minimal educational standards before they can cast a ballot. Third, officeholders should be subject to immediate recall for any breach of trust. Finally, the system should be structured so that such breaches of trust have negligible consequences.
And yes, I’m fully aware that this proposal would be a hard sell given the current political climate.
LikeLike
You stated — “For one thing, political candidates should be required to pass core competency tests prior to being allowed to run for office.”
My response — Can a person pass a test that they are trained to exploit?
You stated — “If all other professional trades require a license to operate, why should politicians be exempted from meeting similar standards?”
My response — Can the license be expensive enough to keep the poor from running for office?
You stated — “Second, citizens should also be required to demonstrate they meet minimal educational standards before they can cast a ballot.”
You stated — Does this mean that all citizens will be presented with educational opportunities regardless of the ability to pay for it so that they have a chance to work in office?
You stated — “Third, officeholders should be subject to immediate recall for any breach of trust.”
My response — Does their own party get to decide if there is a breach of trust or the opposition party?
You stated — “Finally, the system should be structured so that such breaches of trust have negligible consequences.”
My response — Like un-doing an invasion to Iraq and maybe paying a “Carbon Credit” type thing for women and children killed?
LikeLike
1. The tests would be designed to weed out unsuitable/incompetent candidates. But life comes with no guarantees, so a charlatan might still pass through the gates. Hence the reason for rule number three.
2. I stated that citizens wishing to vote would need to meet minimal educational standards prior to casting a ballot. Since taxpayer-funded public education is already in place this should not pose a great challenge. But to answer your question: those aspiring to run for public office would have to acquire the necessary credentials at their own expense — the same as for any other profession.
3. By design, office holders are ultimately beholden to enact the wishes of their electors, not their parties. Therefore the electors retain the ultimate right to hold a recall.
4. We obviously can’t undo the past; but that doesn’t mean we can’t institute preventive measures to mitigate against the possibility of repeating them.
LikeLike
You stated — “The tests would be designed to weed out unsuitable/incompetent candidates.”
My response — I’ve never seen a test that can’t be passed in a desired way through money and training. Are there any real-world examples of such a test that I could review?
You stated – “citizens wishing to vote would need to meet minimal educational standards prior to casting a ballot. Since taxpayer-funded public education is already in place this should not pose a great challenge.”
My response — If all that is needed is a high Scholl education then clearly there is no office that has specialized educational needs. I find that a bit strange, are you sure that is all that would be needed? Or are you saying tax provided education exceeds high school?
You stated — “By design, office holders are ultimately beholden to enact the wishes of their electors, not their parties. Therefore the electors retain the ultimate right to hold a recall.”
My response — So the voters who voted them in should be able to vote them out? This sounds a lot like what we currently have in place. I think you are saying you want more recall options but the challenge may be that during a recall you get the same party line vote. I’m not convinced this is a viable option that would be effective.
You stated — “but that doesn’t mean we can’t institute preventive measures to mitigate against the possibility of repeating them.”
My response — What would such a measure look like? Do you have a proposed example of how to stop a government from making the same mistakes it’s been making since conception?
LikeLike
1. I’m not sure exactly what you are asking. The whole point of any technical or professional educational undertaking is to acquire the requisite skills needed to fufill the basic job requirements so you can pass the vetting process. Moreover, your starting position is usually commensurate with your level of practical experience. How is this a problem?
2. Again, the educational requirements placed on the voters would be less stringent than those placed on the candidates. I’m referring to the fundamental objects of primary education required to create informed and productive citizens outlined in Jefferson’s Rockfish Gap Report:
3. I’m saying that electors must retain the right to recall representatives who abandon their duties and responsibilities under the constitution. So yes: it’s viability is entirely dependent upon the willingness of the people to enforce and uphold their constitutional rights.
4. For examples of these preventive measures I’ll refer you to the founding documents. Unfortunately, those safeguards have been stripped away by each successive administration ever since the ink dried.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You stated — “3. I’m saying that electors must retain the right to recall representatives who abandon their duties and responsibilities under the constitution. So yes: it’s viability is entirely dependent upon the willingness of the people to enforce and uphold their constitutional rights.
My response — This may be where most of the problems stem from. Most people don’t know anything about the constitution.
You stated — “4. For examples of these preventive measures I’ll refer you to the founding documents. Unfortunately, those safeguards have been stripped away by each successive administration ever since the ink dried.
I would say that case law is effectively stripping constitutional rights from the citizens and again lack of knowledge of this happening is an issue.
It would seem we have a public education issue.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“It would seem we have a public education issue.”
Exactly. If you haven’t done so already, check out “Dumbing Us Down: The Hidden Curriculum of Compulsory Schooling” by John Taylor Gotto.
When I went to school, there was still a heavy emphasis on doing your own research. Now, it appears, the emphasis is on indoctrination and parroting the politically-approved ideology of the day.
“What did you do in school today? Think or believe?” ~ Ralph Nader’s Father
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sounds interesting, I will get my hands in it, thanks!
LikeLike
That’s sick!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Racheal's Novels and commented:
And we are supposed to trust the authorities to take care of us..?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Horrible! Even worse than introducing the cane toad here in Aus (much worse).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Truly sickening .
LikeLiked by 1 person
They either thought they could control nature or everything is a game to them.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Exactly!
LikeLiked by 1 person
How apropos to repost considering what’s going on now.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hmm… I hadn’t thought of that. Makes you wonder if they caused it. Either way, we are all living with it now.
What get’s me is how they are locking down cities on one side of the globe and over here we don’t seem to care but at the same time we are not seeing a large number of infections.
Strange
LikeLike
TPTB keep pushing climate change, overpopulation & 5G. The clear message is…save the planet by killing all the people…one way or another.
I’m always cognizant of the Georgia Guidestones.
LikeLiked by 2 people
It’s either that OR they just want more money
The two look the same
Maybe two birds with one stone
LikeLike
Well, money is just a medium of exchange. I think their basic idea is the old feudalism model…lords & serfs. You can’t be a Lord without serfs. Material possessions come, and go, and change with tastes. I think it is more about power…power over others, power over nature… Then, there are the really high-minded who want to harness the power over the Universe (good luck with that).
The two look the same?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think there is a level at the top where money is boring. Let’s say in the top 300. After that I think there are just armies of money hungry zombies raping the earth and stepping on children to get more of it.
Just a thought
LikeLike
Good point.
LikeLiked by 1 person